A man who made a £1.35m claim for damages for injuries in a car crash has been jailed for a year after a court found him guilty of contempt of court.
Footage of James Shikell showing him playing football revealed he had exaggerated his symptoms.
His father Robert Shikell also received a year’s imprisonment for his role in supporting his son’s claim whilst a third man, Simon Fennell was fined for providing a false statement in James Shikell’s personal injury claim.
Elaine Chapman, a partner at Weightmans who advised the Motor Insurers’ Bureau in the defence of the personal injury claim and in bringing the contempt of court claim, commented: “This landmark judgment sends a clear and resounding message that high value cases are no longer the ‘no lose gamble’ for individuals making fraudulent claims.
“The custodial sentences imposed reflect the zero tolerance approach of the judiciary towards insurance fraud.”
Mr Shikell was involved in a road traffic accident in the early hours of 31 December 2002. He was with other passengers in a vehicle driven by Richard Powell, who was uninsured. It was accepted by all sides that the accident was caused by Mr Powell’s negligent driving.
A personal injury claim was issued in the High Court by Irwin Mitchell Solicitors for all three passengers in the vehicle in December 2005. Because Mr Powell was uninsured, the Motor Insurers’ Bureau stood as the defendant in the personal injury claim. A substantial claim for serious personal injury for James Shikell was made which included cognitive, behavioural and physical impairments including impairment of memory, anxiety, aching and stiffness in his neck and ankles.
In December 2008, the Motor Insurers’ Bureau instructed Weightmans to use enquiry agents, who filmed Mr Shikell playing football vigorously and competitively throughout a 90-minute game.
A request seeking information in relation to his football playing was sent to him however this request was never answered, although it was evident from the football club’s website that Mr Shikell was captain of the team and had played in all of the matches that season, having gained in some the accolade of ‘man of the match’.
The MIB was granted permission in October 2009 to bring proceedings for contempt of court against James Shikell, his father and his football team mate Simon Fennell on the basis that they were all actively involved in attempting to pervert the course of justice.
Ms Chapman commented: “Twenty-four counts were brought in total, with 16 of those brought against James Shikell. These counts were based on the witness statements he made to the effect that he was unable to play football and on his general level of incapacity.
“The case against the father Robert Shikell was based on statements he provided and the fact that he was present during certain examinations with medical and legal professionals and heard the false reports made by his son.”
Her Honour Judge Blecher, sitting at Leeds District Court, found James Shikell guilty of 14 of the 16 counts against him. She said that she was satisfied beyond all reasonable doubt that the only reason for him telling the lie was to increase the likely award of damages in the personal injury claim.
Ms Chapman said the case will pave the way for insurers to tackle those claimants they believe are submitting fraudulent or exaggerated claims for damages following injury: “The insurance industry loses millions to fraudulent claims every year but cases like this one show that the tide is turning. Insurers are no longer willing to be cowed into paying out for fraudulent claims and we expect this case to lead the fight against fraudulent personal injury claims.”
Medico Legal News Source: PostOnline
